This is a theory based on atom to atom particle transfer and how one simple particle could explain, gravity, light, and time. Please evaluate
The UNDISCOVERED PARTICLE
By Frank R. Naypaver, Copyright Jan. 1994 -1997
Gravity, light, magnetism and time are magnifications of a common atomic decay process of the protons in atoms. This process was first theorized by Democritus, 500BC (atoms are the basic building blocks of matter and rocket themselves around in space) and more recently by Werner Heisenberg, 1927 (the virtual atom with atom to atom transfer of particles without mass) and Hideki Yukawa, 1935 (virtual atoms with atom to atom transfer of particles with mass). The forward thinking of these men, while moving science in the right direction, did not receive the attention it deserved in the scientific community. This may have occurred because a complete model of atom to atom particle transfer could not be justified at that time in history. Hence, we will attempt to give an informal condensed preview of the atom to atom transfer model, in order to prompt some constructive discussion on it.
The concept of Heisenberg and Yukawa's virtual atoms, that particles are exchanged between atoms, seems impossible to comprehend. Yukawa in 1935, envisioned a single huge particle propelled off the nucleus of a atom, colliding with local atoms, holding them apart and being annihilated in the process. He named this particle the Pion Boson and predicted science would detect these undiscovered particles in the future. In 1947, Cecil Frank Powell and co-workers located what he believed to be Pion Bosons in cosmic rays. Each form had a slightly different mass, all decay in seconds, and all are composite particles made from quarks. Yukawas' theory of pion bosons seemed to explain the nuclear strong force, but the 1964 Murray Gell-Manns' quark theory, soon led to the understanding that pion bosons and the nuclear strong force are side effects of a more essential strong force. A downside of Yukawas' virtual atom theory is that if atom nuclei continuously expel particle mass at the rate necessary to react on themselves and other atoms, they would soon deplete themselves into nonexistence. The key to this paradox could be time. Einstein and other noted scientists sought the answer to the riddle that would combine matter, time and gravity into a single common act of nature. Perhaps the knowledge they sought is as follows.
In the beginning of the universe, let us assume a great disturbance forced all matter into existence as momentum. This matter is what we call atoms. In general, the atoms' model consists of the proton, neutron and electrons. The neutron (mass of 939.6 MeV) decays and become unstable, turning into protons (mass of 938.3 MeV). Protons decay actively until they become stable again as electrons (mass of .511 MeV). It has been predicted that the above atomic components are made of smaller particles called quarks. But, to visualize and understand the workings of the universe, there must be yet an undiscovered basic matter particle with the following properties. I'll call them Naytrons
( Nuclear Ablative Yoke - trons or particles). If this basic particle, smaller then quarks, is stable in quantities large enough to build quarks, then quarks build into electrons, protons and neutrons. The naytron particle bases its existence on work done by Max K.E.L. Planck (German: 1858-1947) Law of wave motion (W=fl) and Law of electromagnetic energy (E=hf) and (E=hc/l) and on Niels Bohr (1913) work in defining the size and structure of the electron orbits of atoms. If virtual particles need the mass and impact velocity to move and hold atomic components together, one should consider that eight electrons must be held in Bohrs' precisely defined orbits by virtual particles in atoms. This means the particles are smaller then electrons, otherwise electrons would be carried off by them. Assume the electron tries to reach the proton but keeps being knocked back by a high frequency pulsing flow of light speed undiscovered particles, like a ping pong ball caught in a vertical air flow from a hair dryer. Using Planck wave length to frequency law, one can find the frequency of (5.5 giga-giga cycle) light speed particle wave fronts needed to hold off the first orbit electrons at .529 angstroms from the atomic nucleus. The smallest of the Up Quarks (1MeV), turns out to be bigger than electrons (0.511MeV), so logic would suggest there is a smaller particle making up quarks. Virtual means that the unknown particles appear, do work and disappear. Since Fermi labs smashes atomic particles into new particles that decay into other new particles and energy all the time, our undiscovered particle should be able to do the same. Then our undiscovered particles smash themselves into quarks. The other needed properties of the undiscovered particles are: if there are huge numbers of quark fragments exploding in smoke ring-like clouds away from the proton, flowing like water blasts from a high pressure hose, this flow would contain mass equal to the predicted boson particle. If protons align themselves to discharge a flow of smoke ring-like wave pulses radiated in X,Y, Z, -X, -Y and -Z axis directions, six particle rings would intersect at 8 points per cycle, which would hold 8 electrons in each cycle or Bohrs' shell distances. The undiscovered particle is stable only for a short time, less then a second, in empty space. When a naytron decays, one electron volt of energy is released. This is enough energy to always propel the one million naytrons that make up a standard quarks' mass (1 MeV), out into space at the speed of light. It is also enough reaction energy to accelerate an electron mass (.511 MeV) to the potential of 1 volt. Neutrons that have lost a few quarks, become unstable and we call them protons. Protons decay 5.5 giga-giga (10x18) naytrons per sec, every second expelling 1 million times that mass in smoke ring-like clouds, towards other atoms. The reaction to this holds (or rockets) the protons and neutrons together at about 30 to 40 tons of force and is the nuclear strong force making protons a positive source of output. The pulsating flow of exploded quark particles (naytrons) is very close to cosmic ray frequencies of 1.2 giga-giga (10x18) pulses per sec coming from outer space. If this sounds familiar, it is. Cecil Frank Powell and co-workers found something like this in cosmic rays. Were they looking at Pions Bosons or the undiscovered particles? If these experiments were redone, looking for a large flow of small particles doing the work of the large predicted pion particle, would naytrons become a good candidate? ( GRAVITY ) As discussed, decaying naytrons propel quark mass at light speed thru empty space from atom to atom, rocketing protons and neutrons towards each other, holding them there as the nuclear strong force. The electrons of this atom and adjacent atoms gets captured in this naytron particle exhaust stream, absorbs and re-emits excess collected quarks, giving electrons their negative sign and account for the nuclear weak force. At greater distances, atoms impacted by relayed atom to atom disturbances of naytrons, collect, and in order to remain stable, re-emit excess quark mass outputs in order to rocket them towards the largest incoming particle source. Since these atoms are not being pushed into a strong stream of particle flow that could stop their forward progress, they move towards the greatest incoming particle source. We call this the force of gravity. Because galactic space is not empty, one naytron explosion sends a million naytrons or standard quark mass, flying outwards toward other atoms. The naytron collisions with these atoms form new quarks that replenish the quarks that these atoms are losing. They, in turn, pass their quark matter to replenish atoms that are further out. This process continues throughout the universe. Disturbing an atom, produces surges in an atom's naytron output. This disturbance is relayed from atom to atom through the universe as heat in the form of light, radio waves, x-rays and any other types of EMF radiation. The loss of naytrons, in the normal decay of atom protons to the universe, is what we term as time. There are two basic types of time. Galactic time, which is the time Einstein talks about and is the overall gradual loss of naytron mass in the universe, and virtual time which is a living entity's concept of the passage of time. Example: microbes perceive their entire lives in hours, insects' lives in months, animals' lives in years, humans' lives in decades, and trees' lives in centuries. Virtual time may appear unchanged because virtual time depends on the perception of time by a life form or entity. Galactic time is an overall constant and can change greatly from place to place in the universe, such as in areas of space where atom proton particle loss is not replaced, like the dark matter areas of the universe and in the middle of solar bodies where the atoms direct their naytron outputs away from the core. Protons of these atoms are taken out of the flow of particles from their surrounding atoms. The result is naytron depletion. The atom quickly decays all their particles away in a surge that nearby atoms pick up and relay as heat. In this case, time passed quickly for these isolated atoms and is how an unknown 3rd nuclear reaction, nuclear depletion, works to heat the cores of planets and suns and is why deep space and the galaxy fringes expel so much heat . In places in the universe where there are large solar bodies and there are more naytrons being collected than the protons of the atoms can expel, the atoms can't decay. Thus, time slows down, and in the case of black holes where the flow of naytrons is extreme, time stops. This is also true in accelerating objects where their atoms are forced to collide with and pass through the output flows of local space atoms, thus forcing the moving object to collect more than the normal naytrons and slowing proton decay and time on the object.
The E=MC2 formula of Einstein, a system where matter can neither be created or destroyed, can not be complete until time is also taken into consideration. Then, in order to fully describe the universe, time should be added to Einstein's equation as T=1/MC2. The revised formula indicates that matter can neither be created nor destroyed, but changes proportionally into energy and inversely proportionally into time. Thus, when energy or mass increase, time decreases and when energy or mass decrease, then time increases. This allows for the loss of energy and mass in the universe with time increasing to maintain equilibrium. The T=1/ MC2 formula means time slows when mass is in acceleration. This advanced formula indicates that the loss of mass or energy in the universe will result in a gain of time. Since loss of naytron particle mass causes exchanges from atom to atom at the speed of light, per speed of light, time increases. In some special case naytron particle exchanges, the naytron particle clouds fail to attain the necessary light speed force needed to rebuild stable standard quarks. This results in a smaller speed of light (C2) value. If time (T) remains the same, then the mass (M) increases and will show up as an increase in E (energy), which is basically atomic fusion and fission energy.
The universe is filled with matter that is constantly losing momentum, decaying tiny particle by tiny particle. As these particles explode, propelling left over quark naytron particles into local atoms and replenishing their loss of particles, atoms in the universe which would only last for fractions of a second and decay in a flash of heat (naytron output surges), get replenished by other decaying (fast time) atoms in the universe and time for these atoms pass slowly. As galactic time passes, there is less matter in the universe. This is why time proceeds in only one direction. The energy (mass) of a system is always less as time passes. Entropy is the loss of energy and is the result of a system used over time in a universe, continuously losing mass and energy. As an example, dropping a one kilogram steel ball from a three meter height will efficiently bounce back up off of a steel slab less then three meters. The ball will bounce less each time until it stops. There is always a loss of energy and mass in the system because the earth and the universe lose energy and mass as time increases. When events in time occur, the before and after reactions are not equal in mass and energy. Thus, there is always less energy and mass after an event in time on earth. In the same experiment performed under special conditions, such as near a black hole or on a space craft traveling near the speed of light, the steel ball would bounce the same height each time and would not stop. At faster than light speeds, the ball may actually bounce higher at each bounce. The universe, while expanding, is losing mass and will continue to until the last naytron of the last quark of the last proton of the last hydrogen atom is gone leaving the space we reside in, totally full of time .
QUICK LOOK AT REALITY
The basic rule that might explain the workings of the entire universe is: First Case - Naytrons produced only in black holes or at creation, perhaps by the energies equal to the big bang theory, can be stable in specific numbers as standard quark masses. Naytrons decay (i.e. explode, lose time) at a natural universal rate in the quarks that make up protons and anti-matter. Reaction to this naytron loss is responsible for all the energy, movement and time in the universe. Protons expel quark fragment mass (naytrons) outwardly at the speed of light. These smoke ring-like fragment bundles collide into nearby atomic particles (neutrons, protons and electrons of atoms). Speed of light local quark fragment accumulate into new stable quark masses on collision with a atomic particle. The stable particle will react to the new unstable number of quark by movement in space and by annihilation of a naytron in an old quark for every new quark formed. The re-emitted quark matter is expelled at light speed, opposite in direction to the highest incoming concentration of newly received quark matter, as is the reactive movement in space of the particle. This accounts for nuclear strong, nuclear weak and gravity forces. Second Case - If naytrons fail to gain the speed of light momentum needed to produce stable quarks, they will change into energy, losing their time. Third Case - If naytrons fail to collide with matter, imparting their speed of light momentum to form quarks, they will decay into energy giving up their time. Receiving, reacting and expelling into quark fragment mass is responsible for all universal phenomenons. Based on these ideas, the universe has a more logical basis.
Medium for light: Time, gravity, light and heat, all EMF energy, use atoms as the transferring medium through space. Light is in particles and wavelike (particles passing through a vacuum from atom to atom forming a wave disturbance in the atoms of space). This also explains why light, unlike sound, slows down through dense media and speeds up through less atom populated space. This is because there are millions more relays through dense matter. The photon theory does not explain how photon particles can slow through glass and then accelerate on exiting, or how light (photons) can travel through a coiled fibre optic line. The undiscovered particle theory does.
Can we prove naytrons exist? Yes,.we think we have. In this theory, one naytron explodes inside a standard quark, propelling a smoke ring-like fragment cloud, one million naytron quarks, away from the atomic particle. When three of these rings expand out in the X, Y and Z directions from an atom's nucleus flowing out in giga-giga cycle pulses. Their intersection point is dense enough to stop an electron from rocketing itself into the atomic nucleus. This is why only 8 electrons can occupy each electron shell and why quarks come in 1/3 charges. As light is transferred from atom to atom, the small smoke rings pattern themselves into bigger rings, each forming rings of rings, roughly the diameter of the wave length. The more overlapping and different sized rings in each wave front, the more heat is transferable. The more wave pulses, the more heat is transferable. In this way, these multi-ring wave fronts can carry many frequencies of light, an EMF force. This explains how light can travel forward with its frequencies perpendicular to its direction. For proof, look at a laser holograph film plate. Observe all the little rings. What you see is a particle ring wave front temporarily frozen in time, holding all the frequency rings coming to the camera at that time. Add coherent laser light and the film restructures itself to your eye as a picture. The rings of the film hold all the information of the scene so that we can see it as if it was in 3D. More proof can be found in a polarized light experiment where two light polarizing lenses are held oriented so that they block out a light source. If a third polarizing lens is placed in between them and rotated, the light will return. This contradicts the idea that light travels in a straight line and that the lenses only let vertical or horizontal light through. Furthermore, the experiment they don't mention is that the same thing can be done with non-conducting polished surfaces, where light reflected at 30 degrees off of a vertical surface to another 30 degree horizontal surface, also removes the light. When a polarizing lens is rotated in between the surfaces, the light returns and disappears. This proves that the light is not blocked but is altered as to not effect our eyes. What is being done by the 30 degree surfaces? The axises of the reflected light rings are all tilted 30 degrees vertically off the vertical surface and 30 degrees horizontally off the horizontal surface. The combined tilting orients the rings so that just the edge of any one ring can impart heat to the cones and rods of your eye so that you don't see anything. Add the third polarizing lens between the first two and then one tilt axis is corrected, with more of the ring surface impacting on your eye so that you see more light. Usually the rings impact the eyes horizontally and vertically. This is strong evidence that the naytron particle cloud rings exist and undiscovered particles exist also. There are some other experiments, like Young's light wave interference experiment, that tend to produce strong evidence that the naytron particle rings emitted from the atoms do exist, thereby allowing light to travel through the offset slots of two light blocking walls and forming interfering light patterns on a target screen. In 1947 Cecil Frank Powell and co-workers located what he believed to be pion bosons in cosmic rays, Each form has a slightly different mass, all decay in less then a second, and are composite particles of quarks. The undiscovered particles closely fit this description
For gravity in space, we have balls of mass in which all atoms are rocketing toward the ball's center with quanta wave fronts radiating from the ball in all directions out into space. As the distance increases from the mass, these waves spread out relayed through local space atoms and then deep space atoms. These waves spread out at the square of their distance, like Newton's gravity force(Sir Isaac Newton, England 1665, published 1687). But unlike Newton's gravity, these quanta waves continue from the A-mass, straight out into space, relaying naytron clouds (bosons) from space atom to space atom at the speed of light because gravity is light or any other EMF until striking a distant B-mass. That mass then receives naytron smoke ring wave fronts passing through from local atoms, producing more quarks on the side toward the A-mass and starts emitting more quanta out its far side. This then starts rocketing the B-mass toward the larger A-mass. This gives gravity the ability to affect things light years away and affect light and EMF itself. When we receive any radiation from a distant star that make us aware of it, then that radiation is bringing relayed quarks to us. These quarks build on one side of our planet continuously, causing quarks on our planet to increase emissions of quark quanta from the areas of the weakest saturation. These areas are opposite of the received particles, and in turn, nudge us with reactions exploding off quanta boson pulses, closer to the star. It should be mentioned here that it is possible in this theory, unlike Newton's theory, for us to be affected by incoming relayed quanta and gravity from extremely distant stars, even though they may not at this moment still exist, and certainly after hundreds of light years, have moved from the position we currently view them at. As the quanta wave front moves out into space and the smoke rings expand, passed by interstellar atoms, it deposits quarks on them, causing these atoms to repeat the quanta wave front emission, opposite the point from which the atoms received it. In this way, one quanta wave front can propagate into billions of quanta wave fronts. This allows us to see a star from infinite points in space. Also, since the interstellar atoms are hit randomly from many stars, they can rearrange their radiation patterns as different quanta bursts in different directions, thereby passing quanta of different stars simultaneously. This multi-tasking could account for the blinking of the stars we see at night. It should be mentioned that light passed through space from atom to atom, as suggested in this theory, can not pass through huge completely atom-less areas of space. Since naytons, if not collided into stable quarks in less then a second, will decay to time, these particles can only travel 186,000 miles into an atom void area of space. This could answer the problems of dark matter gravity effects, which was not adding up for astronomers. Astronomers interpret dark cloud areas covering star fields in space as dark matter blocking the light from the stars behind it from reaching us. But the mass these dark areas represent does not show up as great gravity fields as expected, and in this theory an immense atom-less void would not pass light, acting like a shield which blocks light without affecting gravity. In the undiscovered particle theory, the dark matter areas would not add to the gravity field.
The Doppler effect also describes what occurs in this undiscovered particle theory, in that, moving towards a quanta burst would increase the frequency and moving away from a quanta burst would decrease the frequency passed by the atom. Thus, red and blue shifts would indicate our direction and speed toward a star. Because the light and other EMF is relayed from space atom to space atom, relative to the observer's planet, all light is measured having the same speed as in the theory by Albert A. Michelson and Edward Morley 1887(Attempt to measure changes in the velocity of light produced by motion of earth through space). The inability to find such changes was later interpreted as helping to establish Einstein's theory of relativity.
Phenomena of Einstein's theory (1915 -- General theory of relativity), is supported by the undiscovered particle theory. A space craft only appears to shrink as its speed increases near the speed of light in the undiscovered particle theory. In Einsteins' relativity theory, it would physically shrink. The illusion of shrinking is caused by the way light is relayed and multiplied as it is moved through space by resident space atoms (which can be a few hydrogen atoms per cubic yard in deep space). As light from a fast moving space craft passes space atoms, the atoms only re-emit part of the whole picture. This is like taking a ten inch long picture of the craft and cutting a vertical ½ inch strip out of it per every inch and then shoving the remaining pieces back together. You would see the craft as being shorter. In Einsteins' relative universe, nothing travels faster than light, so a transparent glass spaceship with a bright light in it, moving at half the speed of light, would not let the light inside the ship travel at one and a half times the speed of light through the universe as would be expected. Instead, the ship would shrink in length, allowing the astronauts and outside observers to measure light coming from inside the ship at the same speed. The outside observer would see the ships light at a higher frequency because of the shortening of the light wave lengths, along with everything inside the ship. With the undiscovered particles, faster than light speeds are possible. Only particle relays between atoms cannot exceed the light speed barrier. Thus, even though the ships original light traveled faster than light (compared to the universe) inside the closed system of the transparent space ship, on leaving the last glass atom of the ships' hull, it is captured and re-emitted by resident atoms at their systems' speed of light and the light becomes relative to them. Then, no matter where an observer measures the speed of light from in a space, it will be relative to the resident atoms and the observer of that space. Only Doppler's frequency shifts will be noticed because the first encountered ambient space atoms see the wave lengths from the ships' window atoms, as being shorter, since the naytron particles are being propelled into them at higher than light speed, relative to the resident atoms. Thus, as light pulses of a ship traveling at half the speed of light push through ambient space, with atoms causing shorter pulse distances, local atoms translate them into a higher frequency of light but re-emit this new higher frequency light at speeds of light relative to themselves. Max Plancks' frequency law says higher frequencies have higher energy and higher energy means a slowing of time. Therefore, the relativity between moving spaceship atoms and stationary space atoms is preserved. The ambient space atoms see the moving spacecraft' atoms as slowing in time, shrinking and gaining energy (mass). A criticism of the relativity theory was that an observer could accelerate through a stationary universe, shrink, gain mass, and have time slow for him, or the universe could accelerate away from the observer having the universe shrink, gain mass and slow in time. The universe cannot shrink, gain mass and slow in time to accommodate multiple observers. Multiple observer reversal can happen in this theory because the relativity happens in the subatomic particle exchange between atoms of any moving systems.
Picture two identical red lights shining back at us from the far end of a long dark tunnel. One stationary, the other mounted on a car moving at some high velocity towards us and incorporate a speed of light measuring device. We measure the two light beams' speed and find that they are the same with the light from the moving car now at a higher frequency, yellow in color. How could this be? The answer is that the light emitted by the moving light source only traveled a short distance at a higher speed of light inside the light bulb until it was relayed from the last atom of the lights' glass lens. Then it was absorbed and re-emitted by ambient air atoms at a light speed relative to the tunnel air and observers. The light speed would be the same with the moving light, showing a rise in frequency. If the speeding car had its' dome light on, the light inside the car would be measured by the driver as traveling the speed of light. This light, compared to the stationary light fixed in the tunnel, is traveling at the cars speed faster than the fixed light. A relativity correction takes place between the car and tunnel system atoms which are first encountered. In Einstein relativity the light from the dome light cannot exceed the fixed light Thus, by some unexplained phenomena the entire car system shrinks by an exact amount, so the driver with his shortened ruler, measures the speed of light in the car the same as an observer in the tunnel. We could say the reverse. The car is fixed with the world and the tunnel speeding by, with everything but the car shrinking. With naytrons the first speeding tunnel atoms that encounter the stationary car, get struck by naytron particles from the windshields' glass atoms. These particles are traveling at light speed plus the approaching tunnel atoms' speed. Tunnel air atoms encounter the light frequency pulses faster and interpret a shorter wavelength which they relay on to all the other high speed tunnel atoms, and the tunnel observer relative to them. Thus, the undiscovered particles work better for reversed relativity.
Reality constants of the stars: Planet cores and suns are heated by a third nuclear reaction involving atomic particle depletion. Solar flares are caused by nuclear fusion of hydrogen isotopes swept up from space, but the sun itself is made up of normal solar matter, super heated by a third unknown nuclear reaction that we call atomic particle depletion, not just hydrogen and helium as predicted by the Hans A Bethe (Cornell University, 1967) theory of nuclear energy production in stars. It is predicted that one hundred tons of space dust fall on the earth each day. One would have to conclude that the sun diameter, being 109 time bigger then earths' diameter, would capture 10,000 times that amount of space matter each day. Over millions of years, one would think that the sun would contain a higher percentage of this space dust than hydrogen and helium. What is missing from Hans Bethe's theory is how the sun attained and maintains fusion heat and what happens in atoms to cause fusion. The undiscovered particle theory predicts that the sun is normal space matter and that the outward flow of elementary particles from the cores of suns and planets, prevent their center atoms from building new quarks. This, in turn, causes time to pass quickly for these atoms decaying all their protons, neutrons and electron energy. This is why some outward planets of our solar system exhibit heat energy even thou they are to far away to receive it from the sun. The earths' core is also a miniature sun capable of supplying us with an unlimited power source.
Space travel: Faster than light space travel is possible. Light can't travel faster than light but man can and will. When we try to push electrons and protons to the speed of light, we do so by supplying them naytrons in a magnetic flux. They absorb the naytrons, build quarks, and expel over-accumulated quarks as naytrons clouds at the speed of light. This matter will never exceed the speed of the particles propelling it. In other words, if I have a jet ski and water can only be pushed through a given hole at 60MPH, no amount of horsepower from a motor will make the jet ski go faster then 60MPH. However, using a experimental high speed jet ski theory of colliding opposite flowing 60MPH streams of water from behind the jet ski, possibly a high percentage of water molecules will bounce off of a deflector plate at 120MPH, allowing us to circumvent this problem. Currently, Fermi labs is colliding opposite traveling proton streams of particles, but one of the streams is anti-protons and upon collision, they are suppose to annihilate each other. In the undiscovered particle theory, anti-matter protons are just protons forced into a stable state and act like heavy electrons colliding with naytron ring clouds, building quarks and then decaying them away in opposite directions of the source. Since anti-protons do not continually emit quanta, as (+)positive protons do, the (-)negative anti-protons rocket toward and seek out (+) positive quanta sources, as do electrons. Unlike electrons, the forward progress would be stopped by the flow of mass of a three quanta ring intersection coming from an atoms' protons. The anti-protons' large moving mass will continue through the quanta flow colliding with the proton, forming a huge unstable proton that explodes its' quarks away in a wave. Some of the exploded quarks do not possess the speed of light momentum needed to form naytrons into new quarks, so the loose naytrons decay into time in a flash of heat.
There is a lot more that can be said about the undiscovered particle but this is just an informal overview. The undiscovered particle, acting within a few simple rules, can explain time, gravity, light, nuclear reactions, magnets, lasers, and much more. The naytron particles operate as a quanta theory between atomic particles and relativity within the physical world. After searching 25 years for answers, is there a undiscovered particle or not?